10/26/2023 / By Ethan Huff
Investigative journalist Steve Kirsch spoke with Prof. Byram Bridle and Dr. Robert Malone recently about the contamination issue with Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “vaccines” and what it means for the general public that was harmed by them.
Contrary to popular belief, it is actually now possible to sue the pharmaceutical companies responsible for these adulterated injections, the mRNA varieties of which were found to contain plasmid bioactive contaminant sequences that were never revealed to regulatory authorities prior to their emergency use authorization (EUA) and later approval.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was never told by Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna that their respective messenger RNA shots are contaminated with these foreign, toxic substances. As such, anyone can now sue these vaccine manufacturers – and according to the law, the FDA must respond by pulling these deadly drugs off the market.
According to Kirsch, the Michigan remdesivir case sets an important precedent for all this in that it has shown that the liability shield afforded by Big Pharma disintegrates the moment any undisclosed contamination of the jabs’ active ingredients is proven.
“The FDA is now at a crossroads,” Kirsch says. “Either they admit that they knew about the plasma contamination, and failed to disclose that to the public and to the outside committees, or they can claim that they didn’t know about it in which case Pfizer is liable.”
“But we have the Pfizer documents that were given to the FDA so we know what the FDA got. And I seriously doubt there’s any disclosure of SV40 contamination. That means we have an adulterated vaccine and the FDA has to remove it from the market until the adulteration is fixed. If the FDA doesn’t do that, they should face criminal prosecution for endangering the public, and not following the law.”
(Related: Did you catch the new study showing that COVID jabs did not save any lives – they took millions of lives, though.)
To make a long story short, there is no more drug company immunity the moment contamination in a drug product, injection or otherwise, is identified – “Otherwise, they can add arsenic into the vaccines and not be liable,” Kirsch notes.
In Kirsch’s assessment of the situation, all COVID injection vials are contaminated with ingredients that were never disclosed to the FDA. Because of this, Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna have a very big problem on their hands that, Lord willing, will lead to their downfall.
Kirsch says he contacted attorney Warner Mendenhall about the matter, who confirmed that Kirsch’s assessment of the litigatory nature of these revelations is indeed valid – “and the litigation floodgates are now open.”
Those who are interested in pursuing their own lawsuits against Big Pharma can check out this list of 90 lawyers that Kirsch compiled in order to make the process simpler for the public.
“The SV40 promoter is found in all the vials and it was in the gene sequence that was provided to the regulators,” Kirsch stresses about the seriousness of the COVID jab contamination that has been discovered. “There is no mistake.”
“The problem was that neither drug company ever pointed it out to the regulators. It’s an unapproved contaminant that doesn’t meet the standards set. So the regulators are off the hook. But if the regulators don’t take action, then they dig themselves into a very deep hole. The law requires the FDA to stop the vaccine.”
More related news coverage about Operation Warp Speed and the ongoing COVID jab genocide can be found at ChemicalViolence.com.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under:
adulteration, big government, Big Pharma, Byram Bridle, Censored Science, covid-19, FDA, genocide, lawsuit, pandemic, pharmaceutical fraud, remdesivir, revolt, Robert Malone, science deception, science fraud, sue, suppressed, toxic ingredients, vaccine damage, vaccine wars, vaccines
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2018 BIOLOGICALWEAPONS.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. BiologicalWeapons.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. BiologicalWeapons.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.