09/13/2023 / By Ethan Huff
On the 22nd anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) decided to grant approval for the latest Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “booster” shots from Pfizer and Moderna, which will soon be available at a drug store or health clinic near you.
Even though there is no public health emergency to necessitate the move, the FDA decided to award “emergency use authorization” (EUA) for the shots to be injected into children and babies between the ages of six months and 11 years. All people 12 years of age and older, meanwhile, are approved to take the shots once they become available.
We covered the distinction between approval and EUA in past articles, but to sum it up again: Approval means a drug is allowed on the market indefinitely while EUA only grants temporary use of a drug during a public health “crisis.”
Since there is no public health crisis, it is unclear what criteria the FDA used as justification to issue approval and EUA to these new booster shots other than a few random media articles talking about “hospitalizations,” and of course the constant rhetoric from the Biden regime about new “cases.”
(Related: Even if you never took a single jab, you may have gotten inadvertently “vaccinated” through shedding from someone who did.)
The claim is that new variants such as “Kraken” and “Eris” are making people sick. And since these variants are not covered by past COVID booster shots, they will have to be tackled by these newest ones.
The irony is that all of these new variants only seem to be affecting the “fully vaccinated” while the unvaccinated remain healthy. Dr. Robert Malone says this is due to “leaky” vaccines, meaning previous COVID jabs caused these new variants to form and spread.
Dr. Malone and many others warned during COVID 1.0 that injecting people with these shots in the middle of a “pandemic” was a really bad idea because doing so could spawn the creation of new mutant viruses. This appears to be what is happening, just as he said it would.
Rather than stop injecting people with COVID shots and wait until the virus burns itself out naturally, Big Pharma continues to produce jab after jab, which is creating variant after variant, which is making people sicker and sicker – but at least the drug industry can rake in some more profits, eh?
But wait – did not fake president Joe Biden declare COVID to be over back on May 11? He did, but the FDA is choosing to interpret this declaration in its own special way by delaying the declaration, clearly on behalf of pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer and Moderna that want more money.
The FDA has spent a lot of time tweaking its guidance and provisions to ensure there is always an “emergency” going on that necessitates the release of more “vaccines.” By the look of it, the FDA could theoretically do this forever, resulting in a never-ending conveyor belt of new COVID jabs to be released seasonally just like annual flu shots.
“So, basically, the FDA administrative bureaucracy self-determined that they could continue to bypass their normal (already lax) procedures for evaluating vaccine purity (including lack of adulteration), potency, safety and efficacy pretty much for as long as their hearts desire, at least until November 07, 2023,” writes Dr. Malone on his Substack about what the FDA is up to – be sure to read the full article to learn more.
The FDA is acting well outside the bounds of its jurisdiction. Learn more at FDA.news.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under:
big government, Big Pharma, boosters, collusion, conspiracy, corruption, covid-19, deception, emergency use authorization, EUA, FDA, Food and Drug Administration, fraud, infections, Operation Warp Speed, outbreak, pandemic, pharmaceutical fraud, vaccination, vaccine wars, vaccines
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2018 BIOLOGICALWEAPONS.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. BiologicalWeapons.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. BiologicalWeapons.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.